Takeoff Guides
Earthwork Takeoff Guide
Short answer
An earthwork takeoff computes cut and fill volumes in cubic yards — from cross sections (average end area), a grid, or a surface comparison — then applies shrink and swell factors so excavated volume hauled equals the fill volume placed correctly.
Earthwork is the takeoff where a percentage error is a fleet of trucks. Cut and fill are computed from surfaces — existing versus proposed — using cross sections or a grid of elevations, and the shrink/swell factors translate between bank, loose, and compacted yards.
On DOT work, cross sections every 50 or 100 feet drive the average-end-area math. On site work, a grading plan and a grid do the same job.
What to measure
- Cut and fill separately — they price and haul differently.
- Shrink and swell factors applied in the right direction.
- Topsoil strip before section volumes — it is not excavation.
- Unsuitable material and muck removal areas.
- Clearing limits — the disturbed area boundary.
- Haul distance for borrow or disposal — volume is not the only cost.
| Item | Unit | How measured |
|---|---|---|
| Excavation (cut) | CY | End areas × station spacing, or grid volumes |
| Embankment (fill) | CY | Same, on fill areas — compacted measure |
| Borrow / disposal | CY | Cut minus fill, adjusted for shrink/swell |
| Topsoil strip and respread | CY or SY | Depth × area, or surface area |
| Clearing and grubbing | AC | Disturbed area |
| Unsuitable removal / subsoil excavation | CY | Area × depth where shown |
End areas and grids
Average end area multiplies the mean of adjacent cut/fill areas by the station spacing. Grid methods divide the site into cells and compare existing to proposed at each corner. Both answer the same question — how much dirt moves — and both fail the same way: when the proposed surface in the plans does not match the sections.
Shrink and swell are the silent killers
A bank cubic yard cut does not equal a cubic yard of compacted fill. Earth shrinks in compaction and swells in the haul truck — balance calculations that ignore the factors produce borrow shortages or disposal surpluses nobody budgeted.
Common mistakes
- Balancing cut to fill 1:1 with no shrink/swell adjustment.
- Including topsoil strip in excavation volumes.
- Missing borrow or waste on an unbalanced site.
- Measuring off cross sections that disagree with the grading plan.
References
- FDOT Standard Specifications
- Project geotechnical report
Related questions
Volume between two stations = (area₁ + area₂) ÷ 2 × spacing — summed along the alignment for total cut and fill.
Keep reading
Try it yourself in PDFDepth
Review, measure, and check plan sets against the standards they cite — free for 14 days.
Start for Free